Description
Synonymy- Describers for the most widely used names are: Cambarus clarkii Hagen 1870; Procambarus clarkii Hobbs 1942. Additional names listed by Hobbs (1989), and omitted here, are all misspellings or typos.
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animalia | Crustacea | Malacostraca | Decapoda | Cambaridae | Procambarus |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1980 | Established | Expanding | Introduced | Regular Resident | North America | North America | Fisheries(Fisheries Accidental, Discarded Bait), Ornamental(Pet Release) |
History of Spread
Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish) is native to the Mississippi and Gulf of Mexico drainages from FL, Mexico, and NM north to OH and IL. It is now the most cosmopolitan crayfish species. P. clarkii was listed as being introduced in 12 states, by Hobbs (1989) and 14 states by Taylor et al. (1996). Among states with established populations are HI, CA, OR, AZ, GA, SC, NC, MD and VA (Cooper et al. 1998; Hobbs 1989; Taylor et al. 1996). This crayfish is widely cultured as food, and sometimes used as bait or as an aquarium pet, and has been introduced into every continent except Antarctica. It is well established in Spain, Portugal, Japan, China, Taiwan, Kenya, and Brazil, among other countries (Hobbs et al. 1989, Huner and Barr 1984; Huner and Barr 1991; Taylor et al. 1996).
Procambarus clarkii has been reported as introduced into MD and VA (Hobbs 1989; Hobbs et al. 1989; Huner and Barr 1984; Huner 1986; Taylor et al. 1996), but these checklists and species accounts gave no specific locations. Two collections in the United States National Museum are from Western Shore VA Coastal Plain sites, located not far from tidal waters. The extent of P. clarkii's range in the Chesapeake region is not known, but is probably widespread and locally common in coastal plain wetlands, including tidal fresh and low-salinity marshes and swamps (Norden 1995). A recent survey of MD crayfishes (Maryland Biological Stream Survey, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 1989-2007), found P. clarkii to be widespread in the tidal fresh Potomac River and tributaries of the Eastern Shore (Kilian et al. 2010). This species is considered an aggressive competitor which has been known to displace native species when introduced (Hobbs et al. 1989).
York River Drainage- Procambarus clarkii was collected in 1988 in Cohoke Mill Creek, King William County VA, which is tributary to the tidal Pamunkey, ~ 6 km from the from tidal river. (United States National Museum of Natural History collections)
Potomac River Drainage- Procambarus clarkii was collected in 1992, from an unnamed stream near the prison at Lorton VA (United States National Museum of Natural History collections), 5-10 km from the tidal river. In surveys from 1989 to 2007, P. clarkii was found from Piscataway Creek, downriver to Wades Bay and Nanjemoy Creek (Killian et al. 2009; Kilian et al. 2010).
Patuxent Drainage- Procambarus clarkii was introduced tothe Patuxent National Wildlife Research Center in 1963, as a wildlife food. It is established and common in Patuxent National Wildlife Research Center, and is probably widespread through the freshwater Patuxent drainage (Norden 1995; Kilian et al. 2009).
Eastern Shore Tributaries- Procambarus clarkii was probably first introduced for culture in 1981, in Hebron MD (Associated Press 1986; Kilian et al. 2009). It is reared commercially in ponds on the lower Eastern Shore in MD and VA and is escaped in freshwater tributaries there (Norden 1995 personal communication). There have been at least 7 culture operations historically, only 2 were operating in 2009 (Killian et al. 2009). In field surveys, it was found in tributaries of the upper Bay (Fairlee Creek, Kent County) south to tributaries of Fishing Bay and the Pocomoke River (Killian et al. 2009; Kilian et al. 2011).
History References - Associated Press 1986; Hobbs 1989; Hobbs et al. 1989; Huner and Barr 1984; Huner 1986; Norden 1995 personal communication; Taylor et al. 1996; United States National Museum of Natural History collections; Killian et al. 2009; Killian et al. 2011
Invasion Comments
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | 0.0 | 39.0 | 18.0 | 36.0 |
Salinity (‰) | 0.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 |
Oxygen | hypoxic | |||
pH | 5.8000000000 | 10.0000000000 | ||
Salinity Range | fresh-oligo |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | 31.0 | 35.0 |
Typical Adult Size (mm) | 46.0 | 38.0 |
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | 160.0 | 51.0 |
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Typical Longevity (yrs | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
The abundance and distribution of Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish) in the Chesapeake Bay region is poorly known.
Fisheries- Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish) is reared commercially in ponds on the lower Delmarva peninsula in MD and VA. The number of farmers grew from about 8 to about 45 between 1980 and 1986. The 1986 harvest was expected to be 12,000 lbs, selling at an average wholesale price of $2.10/lb, or ~ $25,000. The crayfish are sold locally and also exported. Most of the crop goes to Baltimore restaurants (Associated Press 1986).
We are unaware of negative impacts, such as damage to dikes and levees, crop damage, etc, which have been noted in other regions.
References- Associated Press 1986
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish), on the basis of its large size, hardiness, rapid growth, and prolific reproduction, is the crayfish most frequently cultured, fished, sold, and eaten in the United States and most of its introduced range. More than 125,000 acres of land in LA are used for crayfish farming, and more than 10,000 acres in other states (Huner and Barr 1991). In years with normal rainfall cycles, the ratio between farmed and wild-caught crayfish harvests is about 40%:60%, but wild harvest decreases in years with abnormal weather. The farmed harvest in LA is ~ 62,500,000 lbs/yr. At an average price of ~ 50 cents/lb, an average total annual harvest for LA is worth on the order of $50 million per year (calculated from Huner and Barr 1991).
Negative Aspects - Burrowing activity damages crops, and weakens earth dams and levees. Procambarus clarkii also may eat some crops. Problems are especially great where crayfish are not eaten for cultural reasons (e.g. Japan, Kenya), but even where there is large-scale harvesting (e.g. Spain, Portugal), damage to rice fields is considerable (Correia and Ferreira 1995; Huner and Barr 1991). Crayfish may also interfere with fishing by destroying aquatic vegetation, eating fish in nets, etc. (Huner and Barr 1991).
References - Correia and Ferreira 1995; Huner and Barr 1991
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
The abundance and distribution of Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish) in the Chesapeake Bay region is poorly known, and its local impacts are undocumented. However, a wide range of impacts have been observed in the many parts of the world where this crayfish has become established.
Competition - There is concern about competition with other burrowing crayfish throughout its introduced range, because P. clarkii is known as an agressive competitor (Hobbs et al. 1989; Norden 1995). Procambarus acutus blandingi is native in the Chesapeake drainage (Hobbs 1989; Meredith and Schwartz 1960). Procambarus clarkii and P. zonangulus (White River Crayfish, formerly P. acutus acutus ) often coexist in LA but one species may replace the other depending on natural environmental conditions or on management of rearing ponds (Huner and Barr 1984). Cambarus diogenes (Devil Crayfish) is a widely distributed burrowing species, which does coexist with P. clarkii in LA (Huner and Barr 1984; Taylor et al. 1996).
Habitat Change - Burrowing by P. clarkii has been known to undermine riverbanks, levees, dikes, etc., increasing erosion. P. clarkii appears to have larger impacts due to burrowing than most other crayfishes, because of its large size and rapid reproduction (Correia and Ferreira 1995; Hobbs et al. 1989). However, adverse impacts due to burrowing have not been reported in MD (Norden 1995).
References - Correia and Ferreira 1995; Hobbs 1989; Hobbs et al. 1989; Huner and Barr 1984; Meredith and Schwartz 1960; Norden 1995 personal communication; Taylor et al. 1996
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
Procambarus clarkii (Red Swamp Crayfish) and Orconectes virilis (Virile Crayfish) are the only nonindigenous crayfish known to be established in the Chesapeake Bay region. They appear unlikely to compete extensively because of differences in habitat preference, with O. virilis preferring deeper, often flowing, and clearer water (Hobbs and Jass 1989; Huner and Barr 1984). Procambarus zonangulus (White River Crayfish) could be present on the Delmarva Peninsula, since they are often shipped and reared with P. clarkii. These species usually coexist, but sometimes replace each other in aquaculture operations (Huner and Barr 1984).
References- Hobbs and Jass 1989; Huner and Barr 1984
References
November 24, 1986 Farmers raising crawfish: Maryland goes Cajun.Cooper, John E.; Braswell, Alvin L; McGrath, Christopher (1998) Noteworthy distribution records for crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in North Carolina, Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 114: 1-10
Correia, Alexandra M.; Ferreira, Óscar (1995) Burrowing behavior of the introduced red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in Portugal, Journal of Crustacean Biology 15: 248-257
Harrell, Reginal M. (1987) Crawfish culture in Maryland, , College Park. Pp.
Hobbs III, H. H.; Jass, Joan P.; Huner, Jay V. (1989) A review of global crayfish introductions with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae)., Crustaceana 56: 299-316
Hobbs, Horton H. (1989) An illustrated checklist of the crayfishes of American crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae), Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology : 1-92
Huner, Jay V. (1986) Crawfish introductions affect Louisiana industry, Crawfish Tales 5: 16-18
Huner, J. V. (1989) Procambarus in North America and elsewhere., , London. Pp. 239-261
Huner, J. V.; Barr, J. E. (1984) Red Swamp Crayfish, Biology and Exploitation, , Baton Rouge. Pp.
Huner, J. V.; Barr, J. E. (1991) Red Swamp Crayfish, Biology and Exploitation, , Baton Rouge. Pp.
Kilian, Jay V; Frentress, Jason; Klauda, Ronald J.; Becker, Andrew J.; Stranko, Scott A. (2009) The invasion of Procambarus clarkii (Decapoda: Cambaridae) into Maryland streams following its introduction in outdoor aquaculture ponds, Northeastern Naturalist 16: 655-663
Kilian, Jay V. and 6 authors (2010) The status and distribution of Maryland crayfishes, Southeastern Naturalist 9: 11-32
Meredith, W.G.; Schwartz, F.J. (1960) Maryland Crayfishes, Maryland Department of Research and Education Series 46: 1-32
Penn, George H. (1943) A study of the life history of the Louisiana Red-Crawfish Cambarus clarkii Girard, Ecology 24: 1-18
Taylor, Christopher A.; Warren, Melvin L.; Fitzpatrick, J. F., Jr., Hobbs, Horton H.., Jezerinac, Raymond F., Pflieger, William L., Robison, Henry W. (1996) Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada, Fisheries 21: 25-37